Brown Shrikes and the Annual Thorny Identification Challenge!
- Dr. Nial Moores (migrated)
- May 28, 2015
- 5 min read
Dr. Nial Moores, May 28th 2015

Korea is probably the best place in the world to enjoy the full variation shown by Brown Shrike Lanius cristatus, especially during northward migration. The IOC recognizes four subspecies, all of which have been recorded here in the ROK: cristatus (listed in the Birds Korea 2014 Checklist as P5, a very scarce migrant), lucionensis (P4, S5: i.e. an uncommon migrant and a rare breeder), superciliosus (V2: with less than 10 records up to 2014) and confusus (P3, a locally common migrant, that according to Tomek [2002] is the taxon breeding in the DPRK). Indeed, this May on Baekryeong Island I saw all four Brown Shrike taxa – once even all on the same day (May 21)!
This note aims to present (and comment on) images of only a dozen or so of the Brown Shrike recorded during a total of 516 “encounters” (simple summing of day totals, without consideration of birds counted on more than one date) between May 10th and May 22nd 2015, in order to show some of their variability. Taken together, these images should help to highlight some of the ID challenges presented each year by the Brown Shrike component of the Red-backed / Red-tailed / Isabelline/ Brown Shrike complex, even when in adult or adult-type (“alternate”) plumages. Although these shrikes are well-known to present a thorny ID challenge, their taxon-level variability still seems to be poorly understood by many birders who do not encounter them regularly: for example in the early appraisal of the “Mendocino shrike” in California in March and April 2015. And, even now who really knows what confusus is – beyond a useful catch-all name for those “mixed” Brown Shrikes that seem not to be pure lucionensis, cristatus or superciliosus?
All images (this year) were digiscoped by NM through a superb Swarovski scope and a handheld Sony RX100II.












As always, comments, corrections and opinions will be warmly received.







Comments